VOTE 1 - STRAYA
The orange-coated, kiddy-fiddling golf cheat has been relentless in his bang on about voter ID of late. He’s well aware that Australia runs one of the most secure and trusted voting systems in the world, and we do it without forcing people to show photo ID or special proof of citizenship at the polling booth. But our system doesn’t suit his crooked agenda.
You don’t need to present strict documentary proof of citizenship to enrol. Eligible voters provide basic details and confirm their identity using things like a driver’s licence number, passport number, Medicare card details, or citizenship certificate number. If someone doesn’t have those, another enrolled voter can confirm their identity. The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) then checks that information against trusted government databases such as Medicare and Home Affairs. The roll is constantly updated and cross-checked. It’s secure, but it’s not built to trip people up.
On election day, there’s no requirement to show ID. You walk into a polling place, give your name and address, answer three simple questions — your name, your address, and whether you’ve already voted — and if your details match the roll, you’re handed a ballot paper. That’s it.
Despite what some might assume, fraud is extremely rare. Multiple voting sits at around 0.03% of turnout in recent federal elections, according to AEC reporting — a tiny fraction. Investigations consistently show that organised voter fraud simply isn’t a widespread issue in Australia.
So why does the system hold up?
Because Australia focuses on participation and administration, not barriers.
Voting and enrolment are compulsory, with small fines for not participating. The electoral roll is actively maintained and regularly updated. Elections are held on Saturdays, making it easier for working people to attend. There are generous early voting and postal voting options. Polling booths are widespread and accessible.
The result is turnout consistently above 90% - far higher than the United States, where presidential elections usually draw around 60–66% of eligible voters, and midterm elections much less.
High participation doesn’t come from stricter ID laws. It comes from making voting straightforward, accessible, and expected. The system is designed to include people, not filter them out.
By contrast, proposals like the SAVE Act in the United States would require documentary proof of citizenship at registration. Critics argue that such requirements risk excluding eligible voters who don’t have easy access to specific paperwork, particularly people on lower incomes, younger voters, rural residents, and some minority communities. Organisations such as the Brennan Center have estimated that millions could face new hurdles under stricter documentation rules.
Australia shows that you can maintain electoral integrity without layering on mandatory photo ID or documentary proof at the ballot box. Strong administration, database cross-checking, compulsory participation, and broad accessibility can deliver both security and high turnout.
In short, trust in elections isn’t built by making it harder to vote. It’s built by running a tight system that makes voting easy, normal, and widely accessible while quietly keeping the roll accurate behind the scenes.
To ensure I’m able to keep sharing my thoughts as clearly as possible despite my gradual cognitive decline, I’ve started relying on Grammarly to polish sentence structure, improve clarity and conciseness (helping rein in my tendency to ramble a bit), suggest words when they slip my mind, and ensure each post stays true to my own natural tone and voice. I write it, Grammarly fixes it. Respect for the reader.
If you’re enjoying my posts, please consider chucking in a few bob to support me.
